Mo' Money, Mo Problems: Hopworks Jumps Distributors With the Challenges of a Growing Industry

Photo by John Foyston/The Oregonian
The craft beer segment of the market is growing at an enormous rate, and talk of over-saturation is everywhere. Most craft brewers will tell you that they are not competing with each other, though; instead, they are fighting for a piece of the big boys' pie, the macro beers like Bud, Miller, and Coors. However, to be realistic about things, there are more craft brewers emerging than shelf space at your local grocery store.  Let's combine that with the trend towards canned craft beer, which shows no signs of slowing down (nor should it), and you are going to be seeing major shakeups in the grocery stores and bottleshops. Maybe this is why Hopworks Urban Brewery has left its original distributor, Point Blank, to sign with local juggernaut Columbia Distributing, as confirmed recently by sources.




Hopworks, or HUB, is a brand everyone in Oregon is familiar with. Founded on a brewpub model, the brewery has also successfully pursued the bottle market and found success. HUB's biggest challenge, though, may be in the forthcoming release of its beer in cans at the end of the month. Not only now will HUB now have 3 shelf spaces in most grocery stores for its 22oz bombers, but the brewery will be looking for more space to fill with tallboy 16oz cans of the same beers. Will stores embrace having the Hopworks IPA in stock in both bottles and cans, or cut one of them? For this challenge, as well as those of growing its distribution range, HUB has jump the distribution ship, moving from its current agreement with Point Blank Distributing to the much bigger Columbia Distribution. This is surprising at first, considering HUB's long-running relationship with the local startup distributor that could--Point Blank, which holds many other craft brewing darlings like Upright Brewing and Double Mountain Brewery. When you think about it, though, it was just a matter of time, and the release of cans is a critical jump. A bigger, more influential distributor with much longer reach like Columbia can help make HUB's big push happen. That is just my two cents, anyway, as we wait for an official statement from the brand and distributor on the shakeup.


Hopworks owner Christian Ettinger
If you think I am talking out of my ass, then just look at other recent similar jumps where small craft brewers jumped ship to the bigger guys. In my mind it started in Oregon with Ninkasi Brewing, which started out very small and fighting for tap handles with Point Blank as its distributor. PB's other big craft brand, Terminal Gravity, was holding many of the standard IPA tap handles in town, so Ninkasi made a hard decision, that to grow it had to jump ship to Maletis Distributing. Now look how far Ninkasi have come. More recently, we have seen Oakshire Brewing also jump from Point Blank to Maletis, and that brewery recently announce another expansion. There was Fort George Brewing, once with the tiny Mountain People's distributor. When Fort George launched its canned beers, it went to Maletis as well. It seems like to compete in the packaged beer market, a brewery may need to sign on with one of the two big locals, Maletis or Columbia. Lately, it seems as though Maletis (the local AB-InBev distributor) has been gobbling up all the all-stars while Columbia has been silent. Based on a conversation with a source at Columbia Distributing, I believe Columbia has just been lying in wait and is opting to go for the biggest and best bets that it can grow for the long term. While Maletis adds brands right and left, will it be able to sustain them when all of its brands want to grow but stores don't have any more shelf space to give them?


My Predictions for 2013:
A huge craft brewery shakeout separating the really successful distribution-based breweries from the successful brewpub model. Those who fall in the middle ground will have a hard time surviving.
Brewpubs like Burnside Brewing and Breakside Brewery will secure distribution agreements with packaging with larger distributors, while brewpubs without the support or distribution agreements, such as Coalition Brewing and Amnesia Brewing, will struggle.


One to Watch: Gigantic Brewing
For someone who wandered into its modest tasting room in a hard-to-find warehouse in the middle of a neighborhood with no foot traffic, one would think that Gigantic would have a hard time succeeding in this new landscape. Clearly, though, Owners/Brewers Van Havig and Ben Love have thought about the distribution model long and hard, and their business will be based on 22oz bottle sales. Instead of using the popular keep-it-local approach, Gigantic has been signing distribution agreements before it even opened in multiple states across the country, and even in Vancouver, BC. With draft sales it could be a huge problem to distribute because the cost of kegs (cooperage) and getting those shells back, but with almost all distribution outside of Oregon in bottles, those concerns are moot. Gigantic's challenge will be keeping the shelf space for those bottles in the face of new and hot brands popping up every day. Things are just starting to get interesting, and for craft brewers, with success comes problems.

23 comments:

  1. I work in the industry. A couple of observations:

    1) HUB's move was no surprise. Everyone knows HUB cans were coming and that Point Blank wouldn't be able to get the state-wide chain store authorizations/distribution needed to make a worth while Return on investment.

    2) Columbia hasn't been biding their time, they've been pitching to new breweries as hard as the other distributors. The fact is no one but HUB has wanted to be in their portfolo in a long time. Again, it makes sense because Columbia will really get placements for their cans in the chain stores across the Northwest. But the Columbia book is full of long time partners, major breweries like Deschutes, Pyramid, Bridgeport, Full Sail, New Belgium, Stone, etc. Getting on the shelves will be easy for HUB, but most smaller brewers have avoided Columbia because they feel Columbia will ignore their draft business for their established partners. HUB will be low to middle in the pecking order for obtaining draft handles.

    3) I wish that beer bloggers would investigate the facts before saying stuff like "fast growing" and "popular". Just because they are popular in the beer geek scene doesn't mean they're popular in the real world. HUB's growth hasn't been particularly spectacular,they have increased production but you need to take into account two huge pubs suck up a lot of that. A bunch of their 22s have been discontinued in chains. IRI scans place their bottle sales well below other medium sized breweries such as Cascade Lakes, Laurelwood, Oakshire and Caldera. For context this is lower than most of the widely distributed ciders.

    4) It wasn't clear in the article, but Gigantic and Burnside have already signed with Maletis.

    5) The real news for 2013 is that there are several small beer distributors in the works - I've seen several applications for licences. This will be good for the specialty breweries who need more of a hand sell but are lost in the Point Blank portfolio where they would have probably wound up.

    Also the metro area's other AB house, Morgan Distributing, has started selling craft and import beers such as 3 Creeks, 2 Beers and Uinta. They seem to be making a serious effort at it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree w/anonymous on all 5 points. Beer bloggers also need to check their facts & not just try to be first out of the gate. Word on the street is that these bloggers are doing less for the industry and becoming more like paparazzi. We all know how annoying they are. The real news: bloggers decreasing & people actually enjoying a beer.

      Delete
    2. I have not seen a single fact disputed in the article even by the first anonymous. Also he should check his facts as I work in the industry with all 3 of the main parties discussed as well. I agree I should have included that Gigantic and BUrnside have already signed with Maletis.

      Anonymous 2 comment is ironic, complaining about "word on the street" and bloggers being annoying while reading a blog and commenting on it. Uhm if it bothers you so much why are you here?

      Delete
    3. It's not ironic..We are here BECAUSE it bothers us. You may work in the industry when it comes to artwork, pouring beers, and helping set up and create events, but last time I checked you have absolutely no experience in the business side of things. We are here because not all your facts are straight. We need our voice here. We all work way to damn hard to have some blogger misrepresenting us just to be the first with the story.

      Delete
    4. That is practically the definition of ironic. "We are here BECAUSE it bothers us" well it bothers you because you are here then, no?

      Second, running events and working with many breweries and bars IS business.

      And third I havent seen you list one fact i got wrong? I totally respect you want a voice so if thats what this is really about why dont you stop commenting anonymously and email me at samuraiartist@newschoolbeer.com what you want to say and I will post it. So there you cannot now complain I am misrepresenting you if you wont do it yourself. Until then stop leaving vague anonymous comments.

      Delete
  2. Quality observations. But don't think that opinions like "fast growing" have no merit. Never underestimate word of mouth buzz and what it can do for a brand. Even if it does start with the "beer geek scene" Also, lets try and get off our high horse shall we?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe some anonymous smart guy can anonymously start a blog that "investigates the facts" and doesn't call things fast-growing. The pay is zero and the hours are longer than you think.

    Meanwhile, since the local print press doesn't cover items like this, I'll give Ezra an Attaboy for bringing it to light. Even better, Anonymous #1 had some worthwhile clarifications that made it an even better read, until he had to get snippy about the unprofessional habits of volunteer bloggers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. (I'll do my best not to be a dick.)

    Anonymous:
    Yes, but beer-geek buzz will only get you so far. It can be a springboard into "normal people" popularity. But once you have it going you need to hit the market hard, like ninkasi has, before it wanes. Ninkasi doesn't have buzz anymore--but they don't need it (they're in trader joes for fuck's sake). Conversly, look at other post-buzz brands like TG...
    So the question is will these "trending" brands be able to make that transition?
    (personally, I think Hopworks is nearing their crest.)

    As for 2013:
    "Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire."
    (Though I'm willing to push the date back a year or two.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's going to be interesting, for sure. I question whether you've accurately characterized Ninkasi's jump from PB. I think PB deserves a lot of credit for the role they played in the Total Domination explosion, and would argue that while Ninkasi's growth plans would have eventually required a change in distribution, the switch wasn't made because they were struggling to find handles.

    I also hope that all of these breweries find great success, but also that they factor in a likely fall-off in draft sales due to the switch. I know a hell of a lot of bar managers who are loyal to Point Blank. (And no, I don't work for PB.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. First Anonymous here: Sorry, yeah that came across more dickish than intended, apologies. Beer geek buzz is important but can form an echo chamber where breweries are more popular than their actual production and sales show. OLCC production reports are available online. I understand this is a labor of love for Ezra and the other bloggers and I respect that. Again, apologies for an unintended slight to Ezra and bloggers in general.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous #3 - It's straightforward, PB and Mountain Peoples have poor merchandiser coverage, and the chains require beer distributors to merchandise the product. If you want to get into grocery and c-chains with package beer in a serious way you can't be with PB or Mountain People (the chains won't authorize you). If all you're doing is draft and maybe a little package those two distributors are fine.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks to all the comments above, some very good points there. I want to address your predictions for 2013. Can you go a little more in-depth regarding your knowledge and experience in the business side of sales and distribution? I ask because partnering with a large wholesaler can be a great step for many breweries, but it can spell the demise of others. Generally, a wholesaler takes a 30% cut of outside sales, which means the brewery must increase outside sales and production by 30% just to break even. In addition, securing these relationships often means the brewery sells its distribution rights to the wholesaler. This can pose a serious problem if the brewery finds itself buried in a big portfolio. While this may be an important step for many breweries, it can also result in a loss of personal contact with the people who helped grow them to the point where they need distribution. I feel there is a lot of value in maintaining a grass roots connection to the community. This close connection means greater customer loyalty, which any business owner (even those with huge distribution deals) will tell you is important. I have a great deal of respect for breweries that choose to self-distribute as long as possible. A good example of this is Cascade, which has enjoyed considerable success after struggling in the hands of a distributor. Diversity of products and business models is what makes the Oregon beer scene (and the craft market in general), so robust and flexible in the face of continued challenges. Not trying to be a dick, just being true...thanks, looking forward to hearing your responses!

    ReplyDelete
  9. SOme great responses here by people clearly familiar with the industry. I wish people would leave names though so I can better respond to each of them.

    To the commenter who questioned how accurate my analogy with Ninkasi is. I base that info on what I was personally told from someone very high up on the rung at Ninkasi.

    Regarding the most recent anonymous commenter. Yes I almost went into the cut that the wholesaler takes when signing on a new brand but this story was going so long already and that seems fit for a whole nother article about the ins and outs of distribution in Oregon. You point is especially relevant when considering Gigantic Brewing which signed up having no outside sales yet. Interestingly Upright Brewing did the same when they started. I would imagine that this same cut worked out very well for Hopworks signing with Columbia after establishing a very solid brand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Most recent anonymous commenter" here...I agree that Upright has been quite successful going to straight to a distributor, and I have no doubt Gigantic will do well also. However, they represent a starkly different business model then a brewpub that also distributes. They are production facilities with small tasting rooms, so their focus will be more on higher volume outside of house. For a brewpub, the margins selling pints in the pub is about 4 times greater than distributing out of house. The trick for them is finding a good balance between supplying their pub, and outside distribution to keep the brewery comfortably at peak production. I simply feel your predictions for 2013 - based largely on whether a brewery has the resources and support of a large wholesaler - does not accurately represent different, but successful business models in the industry.

      Delete
    2. I said that a strong brewpub is also a key to success, I believe there can be infinite successful brewpubs without distribution. Of course there are others who will do well especially those in niches that dont have either.

      Delete
  10. I think a more relevant one to watch, based on the subject of your post, is Boneyard. They are growing incredibly fast, with the help of Point Blank. i think it's somewhat inevitable that Gigantic is going to thrive for the next year at least...there's nowhere to go but up, and they're clearly very media savvy. But Boneyard is pretty much maxed out capacity-wise, and absolutely killing it. I have not felt this kind of buzz about a brewery/beer (RPM) since Ninkasi's initial rise. The question is where do they go next? Will they follow suit and jump to a larger distributor or go a different path?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I heard Point Blank owns part of Boneyard so they will be staying put!

      Delete
  11. Here's the link to the monthly OLCC production reports. They come out on the 20th of every month, but are 2 months behind - giving breweries time to report. This is for Oregon brewed and Oregon consumed beers, so if brewers are selling in other states the higher production is not reported.

    http://www.olcc.state.or.us/webreports/beer.jsp

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous 2 Name: Bolt

    ReplyDelete
  13. Interesting comments but here are some questions:
    1. How do you know Point Blank didn't already have distribution ready to go on HUB cans with various chains? That's a big assumption on your part.
    2. Buying a brand new canning line (not to mention production material such as cans), requires a serious investment; that in itself would create some panic on a smaller supplier's part, especially if they're working with someone else's money.
    3. Going from the top of the totem pole at PB down to the middle level at best with Columbia is a huge risk. Expect draft production for HUB to drop significantly, and just where will additional business come from? It's not like you can't find HUB in just about all of the chain stores and independants. Keep another thing in mind as well...this is a product with a higher price point than what is in most of Columbia's book. Expect Columbia to push them into a lower price point with the obligatory post-off every other month, thus "dumbing down" another brand.
    4. Lastly, I find it interesting that a blogger in Seattle thinks he has a pulse on the Portland beer market. This post essentially tells one side of the story, reflecting nothing more than pure speculation and innuendo.
    By the way, I find it curious that you place the Columbia logo in the middle of your story. Just who is promoting who?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon, you had some decent points going there until you reached number 4. This blog is based in Portland, and if you've ever read more than half a post written here, it's pretty easy to figure that out (notice the slew of recent posts about PORTLAND Beer Week, for example). Thanks for stopping by!

      Delete
  14. hmmm how to respond.

    #1 I never said nor suggest Point Blank did not have distribution ready for Hopworks cans.

    #2 I didnt see a question here?

    # 3 also did not see a question.

    #4 Uhhh... live in Portland, and am born and raised here. I myself find it interesting that an anonymous commenter would question this without any research. Next your going to start asking for my birth certificate.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wow, I was going to make a comment, but got thrown off by all the idiotic diatribe... oh yeah, HUB should have gone with Maletis, Columbia sucks, and PB will do fine with their impressive book of craft brands.

    ReplyDelete